Home > Online & Digital Media Issues, Technology > Thoughts on (and audio of) Cory Doctorow’s talk in Sydney last night

Thoughts on (and audio of) Cory Doctorow’s talk in Sydney last night

Went to the Cory Doctorow talk last night.

I was going to give a blow by blow, but I think it’s (the Sydney + Melbourne talks) been covered well enough in other blogs so I’ll leave you to read them:

Daryl Cook (who has a great mind map of the talk – highly recommend you have a look at it)
Netweb
Cameron Reilly
James Mc Parlane’s Blog

I did however make a recording of the Sydney talk. You can listen to it by clicking play below or by downloading the MP3 here.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Having heard Doctorow give many a speech I’d say that much of the introduction was the regular intro that he does. It’s a great opener for the general audience and sets a good understanding of the history and motivation behind copyright and its relationship with culture.

The highlights to me:

Motivation for DRM
I liked his points on why the likes of Apple and Microsoft are so hell bent on implementing their proprietary DRM

It’s a means to control distribution of mainstream content as well as to solidify the position of their software/hardware by making the switching cost too high. Eg, once you’ve invested money in iTunes music that you can’t take to another device, you’re unlikely to switch to another device as the switching cost may be too hight. He frequently discussed reasons why DRM is bad for the consumer. I felt like yelling out this URL half way through :-)

Internet ready business models
He did a great job of describing what he believes an Internet ready business model is and isn’t.

It’s not:

  • Criminalising the majority of your customers
  • Restricting scientific development
  • Criminalising scientists and technology developers

It is:

  • Conditional access to content
  • Blanket licensing
  • Increased exposure and visibility – his quote “the biggest problem for an artist is not piracy, it’s obscurity” sums this one up well

Content is not king
He contends that it’s not about content, it’s about conversation. The telecommunications industry is worth substantially more than the entertainment one. Why? Because we have an innate desire to communicate and interact with each other.

So, it’s about having the ability to express yourself and have a conversation that makes for a good media and internet experience and not necessarily good content alone.

Things I’d add (aka things I wanted to yell out during the talk)
The crowd was predominantly movie industry people who where concerned about how this digital media era will affect them. To them I’d suggest they watch (or listen, or read) Piracy Is Good? by Mark Pesce. He does a great job of explaining the new world and possible workable models within it. Incidentally, he was also there last night sitting behind me. I felt so nerdy spotting some of these people that I read or listen to who are fairly obscure to the rest of the world.

I was also reminded just how little the average monkey knows about the follies of DRM. iTunes Music Store is a huge success and average people buy DRM’ed CDs. Talks such as this do a great job of informing those interested who will go on to educate everyone else who’ll listen (like you, yes you). I think this has an impact but not a far enough reaching one.

I believe that DRM will collapse on itself. The biggest enemy to DRM is DRM itself. Sony’s rootkit issue proves this. The average consumer gets impacted enough in a real way and they will make choices that impact DRM implementers. The average DRM-unenlightened will only rebel against the tyranny of DRM when they are impacted by it. Wait till they want to switch from the iPod and realise they’re in a world of hurt. They’ll then wake up and want better choices. I just hope that by that point it won’t be too late.

-dg

  1. April 20th, 2006 at 13:58 | #1

    Hey, thanks for the plug DG — glad you found the mindmap useful! Cheers. Daryl.

  2. April 20th, 2006 at 16:35 | #2

    Hey dg. Well done on a great summary. Thanks, Tim

  3. April 20th, 2006 at 17:25 | #3

    I have to say, this was an awesome speech, and the buzz in the room last night was great. Would have been good to have some more time for Q&A though.

    Renai LeMay
    News Journalist
    ZDNet Australia

  4. April 22nd, 2006 at 09:13 | #4

    Thanks for the summary and recording DG, great work! I enjoyed Daryl’s mind map too, highly recommended.

  5. Stephen M
    April 22nd, 2006 at 22:08 | #5

    I was there too – excellent event. Whoever organizes Popcorn Taxi should get a pat on the back for inviting Cory.

    Its interesting that you said “the crowd was predominantly movie industry people”. Just walking around and listening to some of the conversations before and afterwards, I noticed quite a contingent of tech people (myself included) and couldn’t help but wonder whether Cory was preaching to the converted. Most tech people have been exposed to this stuff via free software.

    Anyway, I hope you’re right. It would be a shame if it were mostly tech people because I think Cory has a particular knack for taking these ideas and putting them in terms that people in non-tech fields can relate to.

  6. April 23rd, 2006 at 09:37 | #6

    Hey Stephen,

    The reason I think it was mainly movie ppl is that Popcorn Taxi is a movie industry event and a good deal of the questions from the audience didn’t sound like they came from technical people. Eg, “how do i promote photos online” etc.

    Having said that, I too heard plenty of tech talk while walking around, I guess there was a good mix.

    As is the case with most activists, they often speak to the converted and try as much as possible to speak to the masses. However Cory, in my view, has it right – the tries to speak to the influential.

    -dg

  7. April 25th, 2006 at 00:49 | #7

    Tech stuff is my thing to a certain degree where i surpose i draw the line on how much time i am willing to give to inform myself as we all know its a forever changing world and we want more exciting things out of it, in a way this is one of the things that keeps me living and waking up to the next day to some exciting or interesting breakthough. I guess thats why i am reading this actual blog of dg’s. I have found that over the past months with some interviews with song artist that DRM is not the answer to resolving billions of dollars lost in copyright. The term is often confused with copy protection and technical protection measures (TPM). These two terms refer to technologies that control or restrict the use and access of digital media content on electronic devices with such technologies installed. There are technical measures that could be used not to restrict use or access, such as to monitor use in order to record rights of a content consumer, DRM critics argue that the phrase “digital rights management” is a misnomer and the term digital restrictions management is a more accurate characterization of the functionality of DRM systems. Some digital media content publishers claim DRM technologies are necessary to prevent revenue loss due to illegal duplication of their copyrighted works. However, others argue that transferring control of the use of media from consumers to a consolidated media industry will lead to loss of existing user rights and stifle innovation in software and cultural productions.
    The European Community is expected to create a Recommendation on DRM in 2006, phasing out the use of levies (compensation to rights holders charged on media sales for lost revenue due to piracy) given the advances in DRM/TPM technology.

    So Yes at the end of the day the consumer which pays in my believe has the right to ownership for which he/she therefore has the right to copy but not distrubute in any form has been lost to Digitial Rights Management. Thanks Sony the one and only and the alike….not.
    By the way dg, good on you for your efforts to share the voice of the talk on your blog.

  8. May 1st, 2006 at 19:43 | #8

    Thanks for providing the recording of Cory’s talk. It was certainly worth listening to. Cheers!

  9. May 1st, 2006 at 23:01 | #9

    Glad everyone enjoyed it.

    -dg

  10. May 14th, 2006 at 17:22 | #10

    Well. How about this?
    Progressive thinking from the Australian governement?

    http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=100954

    Along with those lovely tax kickbacks from the budget last week, are these guys trying to impress me?

  1. April 20th, 2006 at 13:24 | #1
  2. April 22nd, 2006 at 11:03 | #2
  3. April 25th, 2006 at 03:08 | #3
  4. August 12th, 2006 at 14:18 | #4
  5. September 21st, 2006 at 00:24 | #5
  6. March 10th, 2007 at 03:28 | #6
  7. March 10th, 2007 at 04:07 | #7
  8. October 15th, 2007 at 09:37 | #8
  9. November 21st, 2007 at 21:27 | #9
  10. January 8th, 2008 at 11:56 | #10
  11. March 30th, 2009 at 23:18 | #11
  12. August 6th, 2010 at 22:47 | #12