Please meet

So very excited to finally show off I worked with EMI and Hyro to build it. Well, I lie they did all the heavy lifting, I cheered from the sidelines.

Way out wars is an interactive music discovery game that challenges your music knowledge and lets you then challenge friends online.

It’s awesome quirky, it features frozen chickens and its all HTML5 baby!

Please do check it out (warning, it is quite addictive and needs a modern browser)

I also got a chance to sit down with the man with the plan him self, Vaughan Knight and had a quick chat about his experience building the thing. Also, check out his blog post with details on his thoughts about using HTML5 and building something this cool.

Please meet web thinkers

I had this idea ages ago. Wouldn’t it be great to ask 9 smart people the same 9 questions. Then be able to play the answers back in any order and choose what’s relevant to you?

9×9 was born. And ta-da… today, we’ve unleashed it to the world.

Check it

Please have a play and tell me what you think. I’m hoping people enjoy it enough that it encourages us to to it again.

Mega thanks to the interviewees Nick Holmes a Court, Graham Weldon, Mick Liubinskas, John Allsopp, Gaven Morris, Iain McDonald, Angus Kidman, Jess Greenwood and Russ Weakley.

And to my friends at Soap Creative. Thanks for helping pull this off in the ridiculously short time we had to do it in.

Ohh, and it’s all HTML5 video. But more on that another day, perhaps at REMIX 🙂


I keep coming across shitloads of stuff around next (and current) generation web technologies that I find useful and cool. You know, HTML5, SVG, Silverlight, Flash etc.

So, I decided to put together a little linkblog of sorts as a holding place that others can benefit from.


If you have sites, tutorials, showcases or anything that you want to contribute, please drop me a line and I’ll get it on.

Better still, if you want to be an author and contribute more regularly please also let me know.

The Silverlight “Vs” Myth

I wanted to clarify a few misconceptions that I’ve noticed about Silverlight. It’s gotten a lot of attention in the tech media over the past week and I’ve noticed some glaring misconceptions (both this week and over the past few years) that I’d like clarify.

But before I begin, I’d like to summarise with my take.

Silverlight, Flash and the open web are all awesome and I love living in a world where I have choice.

Ok, let’s begin…

Silverlight vs HTML 5

Some seem to think that Silverlight and HTML 5 (I think they mean “the open web” when they say HTML 5) are in some sort of competition together. I’m not sure where this came from.

Silverlight is a browser plugin, it’s optional and lives and dies by what it offers you over and above the popular standards available in your browser.

If something can be done natively then it should be.

If you want something that differentiates and requires technology not available natively in your browser then look into a plugin like Silverlight and Flash – it really is that simple!

Today, you would use the open web for layout, cross platform rendering, type, raster images, well you know what the the native browser is good for, I don’t need to spell it out.

You’d consider using Silverlight for advanced media (e.g. smooth streaming with DVR capability), LOB apps (RIA Services etc), Rapid tooling (Blend), particularly around UI animation and interaction to name a few.

There are many blog posts detailing where Silverlight or the open web is better.

The impending popularity of “HTML 5″ will blur the lines between what should be used and where. This is a good thing – it will force innovation from the plugins.

If Silverlight doesn’t offer you anything over and beyond then simply don’t use it and it will go away. If you see value in using it, then all the power to you.

This sort of choice is good. In fact, the sort of choice fuels standards, but more on that later.

Standards are better than plugins

Another debate that I find interesting, not because it’s a legitimate discussion but more because the debate is usually about the wrong topic. I often see a technical discussion about the differences. And, as important as discussion as that is, people often forget the most important part of the equation… time.

Something worth considering…

HTML evolves relatively slowly. The specification moves at the speed of the committee, which is made up of over 40 organisations, individuals and groups. This is to ensure that everyone with an interest has a valid and meaningful contribution to the specification. For example, the current HTML5 working draft can be seen here.

The chart below (credit: Ben Schwarz) gives you a nice visual of the speed of the HTML spec over time.

[image Ben Schwarz]

Contrast to plugins which a built proprietarily and are innovated upon rapidly. Silverlight 1, for example, was released in April 2007. That’s just over 3 years ago and already they’re up to version 4 and have it as the main development platform for Windows Phone 7. That’s FAST!

The reason why Silverlight (and Flash) can innovate so rapidly is that they’re not beholden to a body outside of the organisations that build them.

Now, here’s the thing. Without this sort of rapid innovation multiple technologies can not be tested in the market. If these technologies stick and there is demand, it’s makes a lot of sense for the W3C to look into integrating them into the spec.

The best and most modern example is video. Video came to life online in the form of a plugin, RealPlayer, Windows Media Player and now Flash. YouTube chose flash (and still does) as its preferred platform. Turns out people love video online and developers want it to be a first class browser citizen, thus it’s now part of the HTML 5 draft spec in the form of the

I personally love this sort of thing, I love how where there is plenty of activity and demand, a standard is formed. If Silverlight and Flash only offered progressive download video, they would shortly cease to exist. This sort of “standardisation of the popular” forces the plugins to innovate or die. This is a good thing.

Silverlight is dead, they said so at PDC

There was much speculation after the Microsoft PDC (Professional Developers Conference, it’s like MIX but just a little less awesome :)) that Silverlight was not in the keynote and that Bob Muglia remarked in an interview that “our strategy has shifted”.

I think Scott Hanselman put it best “Just because you don’t see your favorite technology in a PDC demo, doesn’t mean it’s dead”.

In fact, he’s only half right. I would say that the most recent and extraordinary achievement from the Silverlight team has been putting their runtime on Windows Phone 7. Not a small release by any stretch of the imagination.

Also, Silverlight did, in fact, feature in the keynote quite predominantly. Scott Guthrie built an ebay app using it and demoed many Windows Phone 7 apps which were written in it.

But even so, not every keynote has to include every technology. In fact, many argue (and I hear it all of the time as “the Silverlight guy”) that Silverlight has featured way too much in every MIX keynote so far. It really is totally acceptable that “Silverlight 5” just wasn’t ready to be shown or released at PDC.

Not everyone digs the “vs”

In my time working at Microsoft, I’ve watched (and been involved with) intimately how the media reacts to different things. There are many very smart and switched on journos who know what they are talking about. But there are also many who don’t realise that our industry is broad and varied. So, for example, a “popular technology” blogger really should be taken with a grain of salt when they report on developer platforms.

I live on the front line and speak with real developers and customers every day. People who bet their careers on developer platforms. They choose carefully and are very considered and thoughtful in their platform choices and almost always, they choose hybrid technologies. They almost always pick Silverlight AND HTML for example.

The real world of customers and developers is very different to the link-baiting and headline grabbing world of “vs” and “killers”.

Almost done

Ok, that’s it – rant (almost) over.

I really want to emphasise that change is constant and any good developer is revaluating their tools and platforms in perpetuum. And they should do it with an open mind every time.

The open web is a beautiful thing and as a web developer you must, at a bare minimum, possess open web technology excellence – to me, that’s a no brainer.

If you so choose to embrace a plugin like Silverlight to achieve something you don’t think you can using standards then you should. This has always been the message behind Silverlight. Microsoft, nor I personally, has ever advocated it as any sort of replacement for the open web.

You live in an awesome world of choice with vendors and technologies vying for your attention. Treat this opportunity and privilege with the respect it deserves. Not many industries or practitioners are afforded such luxuries.

TwitterVote: the very easy way to conduct a vote or poll via Twitter

Last week I wrote a little site called TwitterVote. TwitterVote allows you to use Twitter for the purposes of voting.

A few people have asked me about it and if they can use it. Well, here it is, feel free to use it whenever you want to conduct a vote or poll using twitter.

It’s very simple to use. All you need to do is type a URL that matches your vote.

For example the following URL:,cher,prince,gaga

will yield the following page


That’s all there is to it, simple and obvious really. The hashtag parameter tells it what hashtag to look for and the keywords parameter is a comma delimited list words or names that it will search for.

There are few optional parameters that you can pass down that will modify the way it works:

&count=3 – use this to limit the result set to only show the top 3 results.

&state=names – use this to have the page not show the results but rather the keywords. at any time, you can click on the screen and toggle the results and list of keywords. This is particularly handy when you don’t want to reveal the results but want people to see who/what they can vote for.

So, a complete example would be,cher,prince,gaga&count=3&state=names.

It’s also worth noting that once all the votes are collected, the page will continue to poll for new results every 10 seconds. It’s pretty cool to see the results change live.

Also, remember that if people are not sharing their tweets publically, they will not show up in the search results.

That’s it, drop me a note if you use TwitterVote and found it useful.

PS jQuery, I love you!